Legal Opinion

Americopters, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 28, 2010No. 08-676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks compensation under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution for the alleged taking of its business due to the actions of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). Currently before the court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment on liability, both pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). These motions present the question of whether a Fifth Amendment taking occurs when the action allegedly causing the taking is within the agency’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Filler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. International Aerobatics Club Chapter 1 v. City of MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. Tulsa Airports Improvements Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Placer Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API