Legal Opinion
United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 22, 1941No. 763PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
In this action, motions to dismiss were allowed as to the individual defendants. A motion to dismiss as to the corporate defendant was denied in an opinion holding that, upon the allegations of the complaint, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover for breach of contract. United States v. Newbury Manufacturing Company et al., D.C., 36 F.Supp. 602.
The defendant has answered and now moves for a summary judgment in its favor. Affidavits of an officer and agent of the defendant are offered in support of the motion.
The complaint sets out a sale on October 29, 1932, of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Fleming v. PhippsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
- Person v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Nickelson v. Nestles Milk Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Albert Dickinson Co. v. Mellos Peanut Co. Of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Boozer v. Arizona Country ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Griffith v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Nagelson v. Fair Park National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- MATTHEWS BROS. CONST. CO., INC. v. LopezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.