Legal Opinion
United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 16, 1941No. 762-764PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The above civil actions are before the court on motions to dismiss filed by all of the defendants except Nathan Thomson, upon whom no service was made. The defendant corporations in No. 762 will be referred to as “Newbury” and “Belmont”. No. 763 is against Newbury and two of its stockholders; and No. 764 is against Belmont and the same two individuals, stockholders in that corporation. The motions are all on the single ground that the complaints fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
In each complaint plaintiff has alleged a sale of merchandise in 1932…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- United States v. Bitter Root Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sandler v. Lawn-A-Mat Chem. & Equip. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Marvin Mueller v. James Abdnor, Administrator, Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Tri-Continental Leasing Co. v. NeidhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.