Legal Opinion
Autran v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 21, 1994No. 869-92PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*33 OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BAIRD, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115. The jury assessed punishment at twenty years confinement and a $10,000 fine. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.33. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Autran v. State, 830 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Texas Constitution provides greater protection than the United States Constitution in the context of inventories. For the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- State v. IbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. MercadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Josey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Ex Parte MitchellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.