Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mitchell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1997No. 1493-96PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPLICANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MANSFIELD, Judge.

Applicant, Andrew Lee Mitchell, was convicted of the offense of capital murder alleged to have been committed on or about December 26, 1979. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Mitchell v. State, 650 S.W.2d 801 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). Subsequently, applicant sought postconviction relief by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Applicant alleged in his petition the State had withheld material exculpatory evidence, thereby denying his rights to due process and due course of law. This Court granted applicant’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Ex Parte ChavezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Ex Parte RichardsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Nickerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API