Legal Opinion

State v. Ibarra

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 10, 1997No. 1360-95PublishedCited by 227 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MEYERS, Judge.

Texas law provides that, with few exceptions, the State must obtain a warrant before searching the place or possessions of a citizen. This requirement follows directly from our constitution, which demands that:

The people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions, from all unreasonable seizures or searches, and no warrant to search any place, or to seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing them as near as may be, nor without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.

Tex. Const. art.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by227 opinions

  1. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Montanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Best v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API