Legal Opinion

Gayle Fischer v. Michael and Noel Heymann

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 49S02-1309-PL-620PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Justice.

This is the second appeal in protracted litigation over the breach of a real-estate sales contract. The first appeal established that Buyers breached the contract when they unreasonably demanded that Seller fix a minor electrical problem as a condition of purchase. In this second appeal, we granted transfer to consider whether the trial court acted within its discretion in calculating Seller’s damages. Both parties appealed the trial court’s findings regarding Seller’s efforts to mitigate her damages. Seller argues that her efforts were reasonable and justify a full award.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Yanoff v. MuncyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. City of Indianapolis v. Twin Lakes Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Aes Technology Systems, Inc. v. Coherent RadiationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dennis Boyer and Richard Smith v. Ernest Smith, Suzanne Cassidy, Esq., and In-Plas, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State of Indiana v. Tyson TimbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Connie Scott-Larosa v. Frank LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. William J. Knapp and Rosalea M. Knapp v. The Estate of Carl R. Wright and Joan M. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Fazia Deen-Bacchus v. Harold M. Bacchus, Jr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API