Dennis Boyer and Richard Smith v. Ernest Smith, Suzanne Cassidy, Esq., and In-Plas, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSH, Chief Justice.
Indiana courts may exercise personal jm risdiction over non-residents to the fullest extent of “minimum contacts” precedent under the Fourteenth Amendment. Still, we scrutinize those contacts closely so out-of-state defendants will not be unfairly called into our state to defend themselves. Here, a. Kentucky attorney’s contacts and connections with Indiana were far too minimal to permit personal jurisdiction. We therefore affirm the trial court. '
Facts and Procedural History
Kentucky attorney Suzanne Cassidy (Attorney Cassidy) represented Ernest, Smith (Ernest) in Kentucky…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- B. D. v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, and Kent Abernathy, Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Craig WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Judi Simek, and Scott Everett v. Christopher Nolan d/b/a Lakeside Farm, LLC, and William P. McCall, IIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Professional Billing, Inc. v. Zotec Partners, LLC, and Medical Management Professionals, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Central States Dev. v. FriedgutNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.