Legal Opinion

Yanoff v. Muncy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1997No. 10S05-9712-CV-673PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION OF TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

Max Yanoff conveyed real estate to Glenn Muncy and took back a promissory note secured by a recorded purchase money mortgage. Available records leave us in doubt precisely how much was paid on the note, but undisputed evidence establishes a minimum unpaid balance. We hold that the minimum is an enforceable obligation entitled to priority over other creditors of Muncy. Specifically, the issues are:

I. Was the trial court clearly erroneous in finding that Yanoff failed to establish the existence of Muncy’s debt to him?

II. Was the trial court clearly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hughes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bowen v. RatcliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Wilder Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dowdell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In the Matter of S.D., Alleged to be a Child in Need of Services J.B. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API