Fryer v. Kranz
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice (on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] In this intermediate appeal, because the employee has shown there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether employer’s conduct was intentional in order to except it from workers’ compensation coverage, we hold that the circuit court improperly denied the employer’s motion for summary judgment.
*104FACTS
[¶ 2.] In 1996, Clint Kranz was remodeling a building in Watertown, South Dakota, to convert it into a casino. He employed workers, including Kathy Fryer, to help with the project. As part of the cleanup, he wanted to remove grout and other…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Walz v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood ProductsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Phillips v. Interstate Hotels Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Robles v. Hovensa, L.L.C.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Lucenti v. LavieroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.