Legal Opinion

E.P. v. Riley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this opinion we clarify application of the public duty doctrine. In so doing, we hold that employees of the South Dakota Department of Social Services (DSS) owed a common law duty to protect a child from harm inflicted by a foster child with known dangerous propensities. We reverse summary judgment in favor of DSS employees because, under the immunity statute, genuine issues of material fact exist whether they acted in good faith in the placement activities of the foster child. We affirm summary judgment in favor of foster parents and hold that they did not owe…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GoodroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Small v. McKennan HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Texas Home Management, Inc. v. PeavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Kirlin v. HalversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Goetz v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API