Legal Opinion
Intratex Gas Co. v. Puckett
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
Decided July 21, 1994No. 08-93-00187-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
This appeal concerns the price appellant Intratex should have paid appellees, members of the Puckett family, for natural gas under a purchase contract entered in 1974. In addition, both sides to the controversy claim a reimbursement is due from the other under unrelated theories. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for the Pucketts, finding they were due sums under the contract, including an amount calculated as reimbursement for severance taxes. The trial court found that Intratex was due nothing as a refund for overpayments made under an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- First City National Bank of Midland v. Concord Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Atwood v. RodmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- EOG Resources, Inc. v. Wagner & Brown, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Duffey v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- McCoy v. DAIRYLAND INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.