Legal Opinion
McCoy v. DAIRYLAND INSURANCE
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 16, 1991No. 10806-6-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Staci McCoy and Clay Vannoy appeal the summary dismissal of their action for a judgment declaring that a policy issued by Dairyland Insurance Company covers them for damages they suffered in a hit-and-run accident. The court held that Ms. McCoy's execution of an "Underinsured Motorists Coverage Rejection Statement" constituted a rejection of hit-and-run coverage. We affirm.
On August 2, 1989, Ms. McCoy and Mr. Vannoy were injured when a hit-and-run vehicle struck the 1983 Honda Civic in which they were riding at an intersection in Ken-newick, Washington. Ms. McCoy is the owner of the Honda…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- City of Spokane v. Taxpayers of City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re EatonWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Signal Insurance v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Concerned Organized Women & People Opposed to Offensive Proposals, Inc. v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Merkel v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991