High v. Bank of Commerce
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San jDiego Comity. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The plaintiff became the assignee of a judgment obtained by one Keturah White against N. A. Comstock and Carl Trotsche and W. E. High. He brought this action against the defendant here, as garnishee of Comstock and Trotsche, in proceedings supplemental to execution, under the provisions of the Code . of Civil Procedure contained in sections 716 to 720, in- . elusive.
A demurrer to the complaint was filed by the defendant, to the effect that the pleading in question did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff declining to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dore v. ThornburghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Scott v. Sierra Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
- McCutcheon v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Collins v. AngellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bull v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Taylor v. MadiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Coffee v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Agnew v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.