Collins v. Angell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco directing the assignment of certain property in proceedings supplementary to execution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Plaintiff having recovered judgment against defendants for $2,742, with interest and costs, and an execution issued thereon having been returned wholly unsatisfied, he procured an order from the judge of the court in which the judgment was rendered, requiring defendants to appear before the court commissioner, as referee, at a certain time and place, to answer concerning their property. Defendant H. B. Angell appeared before the referee, who took the evidence offered, and reported the same to the judge. Thereupon the court made an order that said defendant execute and deliver to A. B. Forbes,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- High v. Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Watson v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Williams v. GilmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bair v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Tucker v. FontesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.