Legal Opinion
Hamill v. Neikind
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 1976PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff, a passenger in the defendant Margaret E. Neikind’s car, operated by her son with her general authority, brought this action against them for personal injury damages allegedly suffered in a motor vehicle accident. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $2500. The plaintiff claims error in the court’s denial of his motions to set aside the verdict as inadequate; in the denial of his motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment because of the alleged “misconduct of the jury”; in the court’s charge to the jury; and in a ruling on evidence.
In reviewing the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. GraytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Wray v. Fairfield Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Josephson v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Speed v. DeLiberoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Fox v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.