Legal Opinion

Chapman v. NYK LINE NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2009No. 35014Published

1Opinion of the Court

207 P.3d 154 (2009)

Merrie E. CHAPMAN, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

NYK LINE NORTH AMERICA, INC., Employer; and Idaho Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 35014.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2009 Term.

April 6, 2009.

Ronaldo A. Coulter, PLLC, Eagle, for appellant. Ronaldo A. Coulter argued.

Hall, Farley, Oberrecht & Blanton, PA, Boise, for respondent. Keely E. Duke argued.

W. JONES, J.

Merrie Chapman, f/k/a Merrie Lockyer, (Chapman), appeals from the Industrial Commission's finding that she engaged in misconduct and is therefore ineligible for unemployment benefits. Chapman appeals to this Court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. White v. Idaho Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Beaty v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pimley v. Best Values, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Harris v. Electrical WholesaleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API