Legal Opinion

Harris v. Electrical Wholesale

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2004No. 29861PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Pocatello, September 2004 Term.

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

Employer, Electrical Wholesale Supply Co., Inc. (EWS), challenged an affirmative eligibility determination awarding unemployment benefits to claimant Brett Harris (Harris) through the Idaho Department of Labor. The Industrial Commission affirmed the eligibility determination on the basis that Harris was not discharged for misconduct in connection with his employment. The decision of the Industrial Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is, therefore, affirmed.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

EWS is an electrical distributor and has warehouses located…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johns v. SH Kress & CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Folks v. Moscow School District No. 281Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Spruell v. Allied Meadows Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Beaty v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Huff v. SingletonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Adams v. Aspen Water, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Talbot v. Desert View Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kivalu v. Life Care Centers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Rigoli v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API