Legal Opinion

White v. Idaho Forest Industries

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1977No. 12487PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Claimant White was a member of the stand-by crew at Idaho Forest Industries (I.F.I.). Permanent workers have various privileges regarding absences from work. In the nature of things, stand-by workers have no such privileges, and are expected to be on-call at all times. White was discharged in June, 1976, on the grounds that in one week he had twice failed to report for work when called to replace absent workers. White applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was denied, both at the determination and redetermination stages, because he was found to have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wroble v. Bonners Ferry Ranger StationIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Oliver v. Creamer Heating & ApplianceIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kentucky State Bar Ass'n v. Henry Vogt MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  5. Idaho State Bar v. MeservyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Folks v. Moscow School District No. 281Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Indian Springs LLC v. Indian Springs Land Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Kyle v. Beco Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API