Brian K. Coker v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court is per curiam. KASOLD, Judge, filed a concurring opinion.
2Per curiam
Veteran Brian K. Coker appeals through counsel a November 21, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied Mr. Coker’s claims for (1) an effective date earlier than February 16, 1999, for the award of service connection for hallux valgus, (2) service connection for a stomach disorder, (3) service connection for the residuals of a urinary tract infection, (4) an initial evaluation in excess of 10% for service-connected sinusitis, (5) an initial evaluation of 10% for the service-connected…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- National Commodity & Barter Ass'n, National Commodity Exchange v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- EF v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Suttmann v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Pauline Prickett v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Woehlaert v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Dale O. Dunlap v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Jerry G. Dalton v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.