Legal Opinion
Pauline Prickett v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided September 11, 2006No. 04-0140PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge:
The appellant, Pauline Prickett, the surviving spouse of World War II veteran David E. Prickett, seeks, through counsel, review of a November 7, 2003, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied her service-connection claim for the cause of her husband’s death. In addition to two secondary arguments on appeal, this case requires us to decide (1) whether VA complied with its 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) notification requirements pursuant to the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475, § 3(a), 114 Stat.2096 (VCAA), despite its failure to provide notice…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Walter A. Bryant v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- Dale O. Dunlap v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Jerry G. Dalton v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Alfonso Medrano v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.