Legal Opinion
City Nat. Bank v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 1, 1918No. 9426PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SPRINGER, C.
The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the lower court.
The plaintiff instituted this suit against the defendants for the purpose of impressing the proceeds of a settlement of certain life insurance policies made by the defendant Martha A. Lewis, with her codefendant, the Federal Life Insurance Company, with what is designated an equitable assignment.
The facts disclosed by the record show that M. Y. Lewis died on December 17, 1914. At the time of his death he was the holder of three life insurance policies on his life, one of which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Supreme Lodge of the Fraternal Brotherhood v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Muller v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Williamson v. WinninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Estate of Leder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Beed v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Woofter v. Fourth Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.