Legal Opinion

People v. Antommarchi

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1992PublishedCited by 498 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

A jury has convicted defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and the Appellate Division has affirmed. He seeks reversal contending that (1) he was denied his constitutional and statutory right to be present during a material stage of the proceedings (see, US Const 6th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § 6; CPL 260.20) and (2) the court’s instruction on reasonable doubt deprived him of due process of law under the Federal and State Constitutions (US Const 14th Amend; NY Const, art I, §6). We agree that defendant was denied the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by498 opinions

  1. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

493 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API