Legal Opinion

People v. Maher

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1996PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

In each of these appeals the Appellate Division reversed the conviction of the defendant and remanded the proceedings for a new trial after finding that defendant had not been present at sidebar discussions of potential juror biases and prejudices or the potential juror’s exposure to pretrial publicity. We affirm the order of the Appellate Division in each case.

People v Maher

Defendant Maher was charged with committing two robberies. Early in the voir dire process, after some general question*322ing had already occurred, the Trial Judge told the assembled venire…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. KinchenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. ThibodeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. CamachoNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. ChildsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API