Legal Opinion

People v. Vargas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

A common issue in these four separate cases involves continuing controversies concerning a defendant’s right to personal presence at jury selection sidebar discussions (see, CPL 260.20; People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247, rearg denied 81 NY2d 759). In People v Vargas, People v Pondexter and People v Hutton, respective waivers of that right are challenged because the trial courts elicited defendants’ choices to waive by stating that certain conditions would otherwise be attached to the examination of prospective jurors. In People v Wilson, the Trial Judge…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. FrostNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. The People v. Thomas JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2017

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API