Legal Opinion
Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film, Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 3, 1997No. CIV. A. 93-4145PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*626MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before this Court is Defendant, Miramax Film, Corpus (“Miramax” or “Defendant”), post trial motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 or in the alternative for a New Trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. This action was commenced on August 2, 1993 by Orson, Inc. (“Orson” or “Plaintiff’). Plaintiffs second amended complaint alleged three counts: Count I alleged that Miramax violated section 1 of the Sherman Act; Count II alleged that Miramax violated Pennsylvania’s “common law doctrine…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orson, Inc. T/a Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film, Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Orson Inc v. Miramax Film CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999