Legal Opinion
Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film, Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 1998No. Civ.A. 93-4145PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiffs, Orson, Inc. d/b/a/ The Roxy Screening Rooms (“plaintiff” or “Orson”), Petition for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and defendant’s, Miramax, Inc. (“defendant” or “Miramax”), response thereto. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed a three count complaint against defendant on August 2, 1993. Plaintiff subsequently filed amended complaints ultimately alleging violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act; the Pennsylvania common law against unreasonable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sheffer v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Souryavong v. Lackawanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Wales v. Jack M. Berry, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Cityside Archives, Ltd. v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.