Legal Opinion
Diener v. Reed
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 2, 2002No. Civil Action 1:CV-02-0977PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
We are considering Plaintiffs’ request for permanent injunctive relief. Plaintiffs, a group of street preachers and protesters, were either arrested or threatened with arrest at events in the City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, mostly on charges of disorderly conduct. They filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that their First Amendment rights had been violated. They named as defendant, Stephen R. Reed, the Mayor of Harrisburg, in his official capacity. The complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief and nominal and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of St. PetersburgCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Diener v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Victory Outreach Center v. MelsoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.