Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1965No. 69PublishedCited by 1,469 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

Appellant sought to challenge the constitutionality of the Maryland motion picture censorship statute, Md. Ann. Code, 1957, Art. 66A, and exhibited the film “Revenge at Daybreak” at his Baltimore theatre without first submitting the picture to the State Board of Censors as required by § 2 thereof.1 The State concedes that the picture does not violate the statutory standards 2 and *53would have received a license if properly submitted, but the appellant was convicted of a § 2 violation despite his contention that the statute in its entirety unconstitutionally impaired freedom of expression. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,469 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

1,464 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API