Legal Opinion
Pappas v. City of Lebanon
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 16, 2004No. Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-1112PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CONNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion (Doc. 18) in which defendants, the City of Lebanon (“Lebanon”), the Lebanon Police Pension Fund Board (“Board”), and members of the Board, seek summary judgment on the claims of plaintiff, George C. Pappas (“Pappas”), under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pappas asserts that the Board violated his rights to due process by failing to assist him in meeting statutory prerequisites for receipt of pension benefits and by denying his request to vest benefits without notice and a hearing.
The question presented is whether an agency’s denial of…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004