Legal Opinion

Peters-Riemers v. Riemers

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2004No. 20030081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Roland C. Riemers appeals a trial court order finding him in contempt for failure to pay $23,465.84 in child and spousal support, ordering him jailed for thirty days if he did not pay the arrears, ordering entry of a money judgment, and ordering him to pay attorney’s fees. We reverse the contempt order and the money judgment and remand for further proceedings because Roland was not informed of his right to counsel when the contempt proceedings could have resulted in incarceration. See Peters-Riemers v. Riemers, 2003 ND 96, 663 N.W.2d 657 (2003).

I

[¶ 2] Roland and Jenese…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. State v. HartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riemers v. O'HALLORANNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sickler v. SicklerNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. D.D.F. v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API