Legal Opinion
Riemers v. O'HALLORAN
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 2004No. 20030280PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Roland C. Riemers appealed an order dismissing his action against Thomas J. O’Halloran and Buckhoff & O’Halloran & Associates, LLP. We conclude the defendants were immune from suit, and we affirm.
[¶ 2] This is an outgrowth of Riemers’ “troubled two-year marriage,” Peters-Riemers v. Riemers, 2003 ND 96, ¶ 2, 663 N.W.2d 657, to Jenese A. Peters-Riemers. See also Peters-Riemers v. Riemers, 2004 ND 28, 674 N.W.2d 287 (reversing a contempt order and money judgment); Peters-Riemers v. Riemers, 2002 ND 72, 644 N.W.2d 197, cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1195, 123 S.Ct. 1252, 154…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- James v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Murphy v. AA MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Riemers v. Grand Forks HeraldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Riemers v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Witzke v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.