Legal Opinion
Psi Repair Services, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1997No. 95-1351PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This case presents several issues involving §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. 1 Plaintiff PSI Repair Services, Inc. (“PSI”) asserted an illegal tying claim under § l and a monopolization claim under § 2 against defendant Honeywell, Inc. (“Honeywell”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Honeywell on both counts. For the reasons that follow, we affirm, on different grounds, the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
Honeywell manufactures and sells industrial control equipment. This equipment controls the manufacturing processes at various…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Highland Capital, Inc. v. Franklin National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Sms Systems Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Digital Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Belfance v. Bushey (In Re Bushey)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1997
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.