Legal Opinion

Highland Capital, Inc. v. Franklin National Bank

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 25, 2003No. 02-5505PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAWSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Highland Capital, Inc. (Highland), appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint against Franklin National Bank (the Bank) that was brought under the anti-tying provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act (BCHA), 12 U.S.C. § 1972. Highland asserted that the Bank required Highland to purchase stock in the Bank’s holding company as a prerequisite for obtaining a loan. The lower court found that there was insufficient evidence of the connection required by Section 1972 between the loan and the stock purchase. We find that a claim under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Michigan Division-Monument Builders of North America v. Michigan Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Collins v. National General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Curry v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. MS Rentals, LLC v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. Mote v. City of ChelseaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API