Legal Opinion

Currier v. Doran

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2001No. 99-2287, 99-2288PublishedCited by 303 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, the representatives of two minor children abused by their father, brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendants violated their fundamental rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Defendants Tom Doran, Shirley Medina, and Regina Sentell are social workers for the Children, Youth and Families Department of the State of New Mexico (“CYF”), and defendant Melba Gonzales is a supervisor for CYF. 1

Defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing they were entitled to qualified immunity. The district court…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by303 opinions

  1. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Randall v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Anderson v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Fogarty v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. Medina v. CramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API