Legal Opinion
Baker v. Mulholland Security & Patrol, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 2012No. Nos. B232172, B234487PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
—Eric Baker (plaintiff) sued Mulholland Security and Patrol, Inc. (defendant), for retaliation, failure to pay overtime compensation, and failure to maintain records, claiming he was terminated after just 13 days of employment when he complained about discriminatory remarks made at his workplace. The trial court disposed of his retaliation claim by summary adjudication, and the remainder of his claims were dismissed after the parties reached a settlement. The trial court concluded plaintiff was terminated for his poor performance and that plaintiff failed to demonstrate there…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Cummings v. Benco Building ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arave v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hatai v. Peo. of the State of Cal. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Huerta v. Kava Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Arave v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce etc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Arave v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, etc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.