Legal Opinion
Hatai v. Peo. of the State of Cal. CA2/3
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 2013No. B236757UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Kenneth Hatai (Hatai) appeals a judgment following jury verdicts in favor of his employer, defendant and respondent the People of the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and his supervisor, defendant and respondent Sameer Haddadeen (Haddadeen).
In this employment discrimination case, Hatai alleged he was discriminated against because of Japanese ancestry and Asian race. At trial, Hatai sought to prove his discrimination claim by showing that Haddadeen, of Arab ancestry, discriminated against any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cummings v. Benco Building ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Beyda v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Johnson v. United Cerebral Palsy/Spastic Children's FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Pantoja v. AntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Roman v. Bre Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Arave v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce etc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Arave v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, etc.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Pinter-Brown v. The Regents of the University of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2020