Legal Opinion
Huerta v. Kava Holdings, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 14, 2018No. B277164; B281303PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNNING, J.**
*76INTRODUCTION
Defendant Kava Holdings, Inc., dba Hotel Bel-Air (defendant) terminated two restaurant servers after they were involved in an altercation during work. One of the fired employees, plaintiff Felix Huerta, sued defendant on a variety of legal theories, most of which were dismissed before or during trial. The trial court granted defendant's motion for nonsuit as to plaintiff's claim for retaliation under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq. ), and allowed the jury to decide plaintiff's FEHA causes of action for harassment based on a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Do v. Raytheon Company CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In Re Debtor ArciniegaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Sepah v. County of L.A. Dept. of Mental Health CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021