Legal Opinion
Russell v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided May 1, 2002No. 10-00-152-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REX D. DAVIS, Chief Justice.
In a pre-trial suppression motion, Michael Thomas Russell challenged the constitutionality of his search by a police officer assigned to his high school. After the court denied his suppression motion, he pleaded nolo contendere to possession of two ounces or less of marihuana in a drug-free zone. Pursuant to a plea recommendation, the court placed him on deferred adjudication community supervision for one year and imposed a $400 fine. Russell complains in a single issue that the court abused its discretion by denying his suppression motion.
BACKGROUND
A…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- R.D.S. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- In re A.T.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Baquee Antar Sabur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- Baquee Antar Sabur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- Danny Ray Maxey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.