Legal Opinion

Pye v. Eagle Lake Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1924No. Civ. No. 2686PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, J., pro tem.

The Eagle Lake Lumber Company was a corporation maintaining and operating a sawmill at Termo,, in Lassen County, California. It owned or had under contract sixteen hundred acres of timber land which it- held in connection with its mill.

On June 25, 1919, the defendant Eagle Lake Lumber Company entered into a contract with the plaintiff whereby the company was to sell to plaintiff, the respondent herein, “the first three million feet board measure of mill run white pine lumber” to be cut in the company’s mill. .The cutting was to begin immediately and the plaintiff was to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Russ v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Hoffer Oil Corporation v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API