Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Calen
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 4, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, S.
The executor instituted a discovery proceeding against the respondents, who are husband and wife. The property involved consisted of an automobile, a watch and some personal belongings of the testator. The controversy concerning the property was adjusted excepting the automobile.
The respondent Clara M. Wilkinson filed an answer claiming title to the automobile by reason of a gift from the testator. The issue was tried before the court without a jury.
The testator resided in Boonville, Oneida county, and the respondents reside in Potsdam, St. Lawrence county. A distance of over a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Tousey v. . HastingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- In re the Estate of CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- In re GoodchildNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of DonnellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Currie v. LangstonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of BeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956