Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Donnelly

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 19, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present motion to dismiss this discovery proceeding at the close of the petitioner’s case raises certain interesting questions regarding this distinctive proceeding of surrogate’s practice.

The proceeding was initiated, under section 205 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, by the administrator to examine three named persons in respect to the sum of $3,500, funds of the testatrix, which it was alleged came into the possession of the respondents within three months of the date of death of the intestate.

The respondents adopted the increasingly prevalent practice of appearing for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. In Re the Probate of the Will of KindbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Doheny v. . LacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HearnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of WoolfsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of KevillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of McgloneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  5. In re the Estate of FarrellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API