Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Beyer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 26, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John B. Sterley, S.

This proceeding was initiated under section 205 of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

The respondent adopted the increasingly prevalent practice of appearing for examination, as directed, but failed to file any answer whatsoever. Had an answer been interposed admitting possession and claiming title, the burden of proof would, of course, have shifted to the respondents to demonstrate the necessary elements of devolution of title to them. (Matter of Housman, 224 N. Y. 525, 526, 527; Matter of Davis, 128 Misc. 622, 623, affd. 222 App. Div. 846; Matter of Calen, 142 Misc. 363, 365;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. In re the Estate of CanfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. In re BucklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  5. In re the Estate of HaywardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of RabinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  2. In re the Estate of SantaluciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API