Shockey v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Plaintiff contends that the City of Portland (city) and two of its employees, defendants Lang and Irvin, fired him in retaliation for his circulating a petition protesting a work policy. He alleged claims for common law wrongful discharge and under 42 USC § 1983, 1 asserting that defendants violated his right to free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. He also brought a claim against Lang and Irvin as individuals, alleging that they had intentionally interfered with his economic relations with city. He sought punitive damages on his § 1983 claim and, under 42 USC § 1988, 2…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Van Den Bron v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Rogers v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnsen v. Mel-Ken Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Robson v. Klamath County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992