Legal Opinion

Shockey v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1990No. 8611-06957; CA A49282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff contends that the City of Portland (city) and two of its employees, defendants Lang and Irvin, fired him in retaliation for his circulating a petition protesting a work policy. He alleged claims for common law wrongful discharge and under 42 USC § 1983, 1 asserting that defendants violated his right to free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. He also brought a claim against Lang and Irvin as individuals, alleging that they had intentionally interfered with his economic relations with city. He sought punitive damages on his § 1983 claim and, under 42 USC § 1988, 2…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Van Den Bron v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Rogers v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnsen v. Mel-Ken Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Robson v. Klamath County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API