Legal Opinion
Shockey v. City of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1992No. CC A8611-06957; CA A49282; SC S36999Published
1Opinion of the Court
837 P.2d 505 (1992)
313 Or. 414
William H. SHOCKEY, Respondent on Review,
v.
CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; Jack C. Irvin, individually and in his official capacity; and John Lang, individually and in his official capacity, Petitioners on Review.
CC A8611-06957; CA A49282; SC S36999.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted December 4, 1990.
Decided July 9, 1992.
Reconsideration Denied August 25, 1992.
Harry Auerbach, Deputy City Atty., City of Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review.
Richard C. Busse, Portland, argued the cause for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.