State v. Shoffner
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. The defense of insanity. In instructing the jury, the learned circuit judge faithfully followed our decision in State v. Esser 1 and defined the defense of insanity in terms of capacity to understand the nature and quality of the act and capacity to distinguish between right and wrong with respect to it.
The defense had requested, in preferential order, four alternative instructions. The elements involved in each were as follows:
The first: Lack of substantial capacity to appreciate criminality of conduct or lack of substantial capacity to conform conduct to the requirements of law.2
*419The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Kojis v. Doctors HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. GramenzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Jenkins v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. McHoulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- People v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MutinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.