Matter of Monroe
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 122-58.7(i) requires as a condition to a valid commitment order that the district court find two distinct facts by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence: first, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate and second, that the respondent is dangerous to himself or others. Prior to 1 October 1979 the statute required a finding that respondent is imminently dangerous to himself or others.
It is for the trier of fact to determine whether evidence offered in a particular case is clear, cogent, and convincing. Our function on appeal is simply to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Matter of SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Matter of JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- In Re BentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re WhatleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- In re: J.P.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Matter of JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.