Legal Opinion

In Re Benton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1975No. 7512DC273PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

While it is clear from the record that the commitment period of sixty days has expired, this appeal is not moot. In re Carter, 25 N.C. App. 442, 213 S.E. 2d 409 (1975), and In re Mostella, 25 N.C. App. 666, 215 S.E. 2d 790 (1975).

Defendant contends and the State concedes that the trial court erred in admitting the affidavit of Dr. Pellegrini, the examining psychiatrist. We agree. Dr. Pellegrini was a witness for purposes of the proceeding. See Bailey v. McGill, 247 N.C. 286, 100 S.E. 2d 860 (1957). G.S. 122-58.7 (e) provides that “[c]erti-fied copies of reports and findings of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. In Re CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. In Re MostellaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of HoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Matter of UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Matter of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. In re MackieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Matter of FarrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API