Matter of Salem
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Under the statute as it existed prior to June 1974 a person could be involuntarily committed when determined “by reason of the commission of overt acts [that] the person is violent and of imminent danger to himself or others, or is gravely disabled.” [G.S. 122-58.6 (a) (1973)] The present statute provides,
“To support a commitment order, the court is required to find by clear, cogent and convincing evidence, that the respondent is mentally ill or inebriate, and imminently dangerous to himself or others.” G.S. 122-58.7 (i).
Respondents assert the unconstitutionality of North…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re StephensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. LangIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Matter of CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.