Matter of Jacobs
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Respondent does not challenge the sufficiency of evidence. Nevertheless, he assigns as error the district court’s failure to make findings of fact to support its commitment order. G.S. 122-58.7(i) provides in unambiguous terms: “The court shall record the facts which support its findings.” This Court has held on numerous occasions that the district court must record the facts necessary to support its findings. See e.g., In Re Koyi, 34 N.C. App. 320, 238 S.E. 2d 153 (1977); In the Matter of Crouch, 28 N.C. App. 354, 221 S.E. 2d 74 (1976); In Re Neatherly, 28 N.C. App. 659, 222…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- In Matter of KoyiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Samons v. MeymandiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- In Matter of CrouchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Matter of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- In re: J.C.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Matter of CrainshawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- In re CrouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.